Maybe if we focused on taking care of some of this outsourcing and the tax loopholes by using offshore accounts instead of taking the typical liberal way of the thief (aka extreme distribution of wealth) we could save some more of the higher end, livable jobs. But the democrats aren't actually concerned with the quality of the jobs saved, just the ability to put a bigger number in their propaganda. The lack of care on the part of the left is obvious by the insistence that we not take the time to responsibly evaluate the health care reform bill that costs trillions before passing it. rush it through! Here's another idea, if the left is trying so hard to protect the common man, and insist that the rich pay their fair share, how about the commander in chief stop rewarding tax cheats by giving them high ranking government positions? (i know that was only a campaign promise and we're never supposed to actually believe a campaign promise... it is a liberal after all) way to send a message obammy, way to send a message.
Answer me this. If the cost of running a business is at an all-time high, why are companies reporting record profits? The liberals would love to close the loopholes that allow companies to hide their offshore profits. But the Republicans' won't let 'em. That's their meal ticket. The GOP is bought and paid for by big business. The fact that these loopholes are still available proves my point. They only benefit the already rich. Bob and Martha from River Falls aren't hiding their profits offshore. Their hiding them on the dinner table. Moreover, the liberals don't want a total distribution of wealth. They just was a distribution that's fair. This from the OECD. Income inequality grew significantly in 2005, with the top 1 percent of Americans — those with incomes that year of more than $348,000 — receiving their largest share of national income since 1928... As far as the president hiring a tax cheat, I don't think finding one tax cheat is going to solve the problem. Think bigger. (give me specifics, not sure what you're talking about). As far as health care, Consumer Reports writes that it has helped numerous groups. The ones who haven't been helped are those whose benefits will not start until 2014. They were pushed back at the insistence of the Republicans'. In addition, the CBO reported that Obama's health care reform is revenue neutral. Meaning the savings from health care will offset the spending allocated to provide it. Let's see. He stopped us from having a depression, he is the first president to pass meaningful health care legislation that appears to be working, he got rid of don't ask don't tell, and he did exactly what he said he would do in Libya. Not all is rosy, there's still that hiring a tax cheat thing and Guantanamo. But all in all he's done well. What I have a problem understanding is why are some people so f!@#ing pissed at Obama. Have we forgotten what its like to have a grownup at the table.
on 
on 
on 
